Home > Newsroom > Speech: National Balance Sheets and Macro Policy: Lessons from the Past
Speech: National Balance Sheets and Macro Policy: Lessons from the Past
Date Published |
3/2/2012 |
Author |
Paul Tucker |
Theme |
|
Country |
United Kingdom |
February 28, London
Speech by Paul Tucker, Deputy Governor Financial
Stability, Bank of England, looks at lessons learned from the financial crisis
for macro-prudential policy
In
an important speech, yesterday, Paul Tucker – Deputy Governor Financial Stability
of the Bank of England, Member of the Monetary Policy Committee and Member of
the Financial Policy Committee – discussed some important lessons learned from
the financial crisis in the area of the macro-economic policy. He looks at the over-stretched
and vulnerable balance sheets of households, firms, banks and governments
across the Western world prior to the crisis and stresses that it is
insufficient to look only at current account imbalances for warning signs, but
that gross capital flows, in particular cross-border banking flows, deserve
much more detailed attention in the
macro-economic policy framework.
Mr.
Tucker highlights two possible international macroeconomic explanations for the
period of pronounced credit growth and asset price appreciation prior to the
crisis. “First, a fall in the world safe real rate, due to excess savings in
the East; Second, increasing global liquidity, transmitted through expansive
cross-border lending, kicked off by prolonged accommodative monetary policy.”
Both of these, he notes, “…involve shifts in risk premia driven by changes in
the supply and demand for financial assets.” These changes in risk premia can
be key drivers of fluctuations in asset prices, and probably have substantial
influence over macroeconomic fluctuations.
He
suggests the following lessons in terms of the policy framework:
- “We must not
rely entirely on central banks ‘mopping up’ after financial crises. Not
only does it strain our capabilities ex post, it is counterproductive ex
ante. If central banks are perceived as writing deep-out-of-the-money put
options, then the market, believing it is protected by those tail-risk puts,
will itself take more risks than otherwise. We need overall macro regimes
that aim to make chronic imbalances and over-indebtedness less likely and
less threatening.
- The transmission
of monetary policy can be affected by risk appetite, and can itself affect
risk-taking behaviour, domestically and globally. We need to be alive to
that in forecasting the path of nominal demand, and in assessing global
liquidity conditions.
- We also,
therefore, need macroprudential regimes to ensure that these mechanisms do
not lead to stability threatening indebtedness or otherwise endanger the
resilience of the financial system. We need, in particular, to be ready to
contain private sector liquidity creation even when it is not driving
excess nominal demand growth. That will amount to arresting occasionally
the expansion or leverage of the banking system and shadow banking
sectors.
- Given its
special role in international finance, the UK owes a special
responsibility to the rest of the world to maintain the safety and soundness
of the UK-resident financial system. It is therefore very welcome that the
IMF has reached precisely that view in its new work on Spillovers. The
Fund must ensure that we stick at it.
- Reciprocally,
the Fund needs to go back to the Draghi Report and incorporate its lessons
into Article IV and FSAP reports.
- As the Draghi
Report stressed, we must try to identify and remove microeconomic
incentives that distort risk-taking behaviour into dangerous channels. And
given the interconnectedness of global finance, we – especially in the UK
– must be alert even to such distortions elsewhere. US housing finance was
a domestic system whose structure led to problems with global spillovers.
- The public
finances should be managed with an eye to the nature and extent of risk
exposures elsewhere in the economy.
- It is the
precise pattern of capital flows, and the resulting composition of the
resulting balance sheets, that matter to the stability of the financial
system. All macro policymakers – monetary, macro-prudential and fiscal –
should, therefore, pay attention to the national balance sheet; and to the
pattern of gross as well as net capital flows.
- But, in doing
so, we and our peers must avoid financial protectionism just as a previous
generation learned to oppose trade protectionism. And we must not leave
anyone thinking that we can eradicate economic problems.”
VIEW THE FULL SPEECH
< Back to News